Your cloud bill is a list of decisions. We read it line by line.
CloudXT is a team of cloud infrastructure, DevOps, and FinOps engineers who have carried the pager for environments like yours. We find the over-provisioned compute, the missing commitments, and the storage nobody ever tiered — then check every fix against your performance and reliability requirements before anything reaches production.
No commitment. You see the waste before you decide anything.
| Acct | Line item | Billed | Needed | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4110 | db.r6g.4xlarge × 6RDS replicas holding steady at 12% CPU since the last capacity review | Billed11,280 | Needed2,880 | Variance−8,400 |
| 4120 | managed-disk × 41Azure volumes left behind by VMs deleted months ago | Billed2,150 | Needed0 | Variance−2,150 |
| 4130 | ec2 on-demand · us-east-1Steady-state compute that belongs under a one-year savings plan | Billed46,900 | Needed27,600 | Variance−19,300 |
| 4140 | s3 · standard tierObjects untouched for 90 days, with no lifecycle rule to move them | Billed6,740 | Needed1,180 | Variance−5,560 |
| 4150 | nat-gateway × 3Staging VPCs billed hourly with no egress traffic to show for it | Billed1,320 | Needed0 | Variance−1,320 |
| 4160 | gke · non-prod node poolsDevelopment clusters running through nights and weekends | Billed8,900 | Needed3,100 | Variance−5,800 |
| Monthly reconciliation | Billed77,290 | Needed34,760 | Variance−42,530 | |
Six findings from one environment. Not the whole bill — the part of it that was not doing anything.
We work on the infrastructure, not just the invoice
Four places cloud spend quietly gets away from engineering teams — and where we go to bring it back under control.
Rightsizing and commitment strategy
We measure compute, storage, and database resources against real utilization, then rebuild your mix of on-demand, reserved instances, savings plans, and spot capacity around the way your workloads actually behave — not the peak someone sized for two product cycles ago.
Architecture review
Storage tiering, autoscaling policy, workload placement. We review these for cost the same way your team reviews them for performance, because a lot of spend is not a wrong-sized instance — it is a design decision nobody has revisited since launch.
One ledger across three providers
We put tagging, budgets, and reporting on a shared standard across every provider you run, so engineering and finance read the same numbers instead of reconciling three consoles by hand each month.
Monitoring that outlasts the audit
Environments drift. Someone ships a new service, loosens an autoscaling group for a launch, lets a commitment lapse. We keep watching after the work is done, so the savings we found in month one still hold in month twelve.
A partnership, not a one-off audit
Three phases, starting with a no-cost look at what you are running today.
Assess
We audit your AWS, Azure, or GCP environment and hand you a ranked list of findings, sized by savings and risk. You owe us nothing afterward.
Optimize
We agree on which changes to make and in what order, then implement them alongside your engineers. Every change gets checked against your performance and reliability requirements before it ships.
Monitor
We stay on after implementation, tracking spend as your infrastructure evolves so the waste we removed does not quietly grow back.
Find out where your cloud spend is going
We audit your environment and show you what is driving the bill — at no cost, with no obligation.
Book a free assessment